Tobacco-funded analysis remains to be showing in highly-cited medical journals—regardless of makes an attempt by some to chop ties altogether, finds an investigation by The Investigative Desk and The BMJ at present.
Though the tobacco trade has a protracted historical past of subverting science, most main medical journals haven’t got insurance policies that ban analysis wholly or partly funded by the trade. And even when publishers, authors and universities are prepared to limit tobacco trade ties, they battle to determine funding sources as a result of tobacco corporations have funded entrance teams and have diversified into pharmaceutical and well being expertise fields.
These investments embody therapies for situations brought about or aggravated by smoking, akin to lung most cancers, coronary heart illness, and bronchial asthma.
These ties complicate ongoing efforts of researchers, scientific organizations and journals to distance themselves from the trade and have led to requires journals to not solely institute bans on analysis by tobacco corporations but in addition on their subsidiaries.
The Investigative Desk and The BMJ searched the PubMed database and located tons of of relationships between Massive Tobacco’s medical and pharmaceutical subsidiaries and medical analysis. Additionally they checked the tobacco insurance policies of 10 main basic medical journals and 10 journals in every of the three therapeutic areas particularly affected by smoking.
Of these 40 journals, solely 8 (20%) had insurance policies prohibiting research wholly or partly funded by the tobacco trade. Of the ten journals within the discipline of respiratory medication, six had a tobacco coverage, however in oncology just one did, and in cardiology, none had one. Among the many 10 basic medication journals, solely The BMJ had such a coverage.
However even among the many journals which have a coverage, enforcement will be troublesome when it entails subsidiaries or organizations related to the tobacco corporations. Final yr, one among BMJ Group’s titles, BMJ Open, retracted a paper after it turned clear that the listed funder receives sponsorship from the Basis for a Smoke-Free World, a bunch supported and absolutely funded by tobacco firm Philip Morris Worldwide (PMI).
Dutch researcher Wytse van den Bosch had a analysis grant from pharmaceutical firm Vectura when the corporate was purchased by PMI in 2021. Nonetheless, his examine was nonetheless revealed in a European Respiratory Society (ERS) journal, which stated the analysis was not in breach of its coverage because the grant from Vectura was initiated in 2018.
Ruth Malone, professor of social behavioral sciences on the College of California and former editor-in-chief of BMJ Group’s Tobacco Management journal, stated that establishments, professionals and scientific journals ought to refuse involvement with the tobacco trade.
“Anybody who understands the historical past, extent and nature of the epidemic and the tobacco trade’s strategic efforts to divide the general public well being neighborhood is aware of that trade cash needs to be rejected,” she says.
Nicholas Hopkinson, professor of respiratory medication at Imperial Faculty London, notes that given the trade’s “long-standing historical past of dishonesty,” it’s “very simple” that researchers ought to reduce ties to corporations after they’re acquired by large tobacco, as in any other case they might be “working with the tobacco trade” and contribute to their income.
At the moment, BMJ additionally updates its 2013 tobacco coverage. Along with excluding analysis funded by the tobacco trade, BMJ journals may also exclude work the place authors have private monetary ties to the tobacco trade.
“The up to date coverage is one motion BMJ journals can take to scale back the publication of content material which downplays the harms of smoking or hinders the creation of a world free from the harms of smoking,” clarify the editors. “Making a stronger firewall between the tobacco trade and BMJ content material will present house for editors to curate and publish content material that’s extra impartial and trusted, and contributes to a more healthy world.”
Extra info:
Tobacco funded analysis: how even journals with bans discover it onerous to stem the tide of publications, The BMJ (2024). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q1153
British Medical Journal
Quotation:
Tobacco companies make investments billions in medical merchandise: Name for journals to ban analysis by the companies, their subsidiaries (2024, Could 30)
retrieved 31 Could 2024
from
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any truthful dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.