First Opinion is STAT’s platform for attention-grabbing, illuminating, and perhaps even provocative articles concerning the life sciences writ giant, written by biotech insiders, well being care staff, researchers, and others.
To encourage strong, good-faith dialogue about points raised in First Opinion essays, STAT publishes chosen Letters to the Editor obtained in response to them. You possibly can submit a Letter to the Editor right here, or discover the submission kind on the finish of any First Opinion essay.
“Psychiatrists aren’t fulfilling the social contract that sponsored their coaching,” by Richard G. Frank
Whereas I recognize the sentiment, this text is incomplete at finest, and oversimplifies a fancy calculus. Doctor coaching is, after all, sponsored by the Medicare and Medicaid programs; most residency positions are, and never simply in psychiatry. Nonetheless, are we leveling this on the different specialty physicians who should not accepting Medicare and Medicaid sufferers? Moreover, the reimbursement in psychiatry isn’t stage — it’s far more restricted and never equitable in comparison with different specialties, notably surgical/procedural specialties. This makes it tougher for psychiatrists to pay the payments when accepting a decrease price of reimbursement than different physicians although the scholar mortgage payments are nonetheless there.
I agree that the social-ethical contract is compelling for psychiatrists to simply accept all of those sufferers. Nonetheless, substantial deficits and inequities within the well being care programs shouldn’t be positioned on psychiatrists to take sole duty for.
On the identical time that we must always encourage psychiatrists to simply accept a wider vary of sufferers, we also needs to be calling out the inequities within the fee system, psychological well being “parity” legal guidelines which can be largely unenforced (and thus meaningless) rendering an unfair system for sufferers looking for care and psychiatrists looking for reimbursement for care supplied.
As with most points in well being care, it’s sophisticated.
— Michael J. Peterson, Division of Psychiatry, College of Wisconsin College of Medication and Public Well being
***
Thanks for reminding me of my “social contract.” I would like a favor: assessment the again door conferences of the Medicare Act of 1965 that resulted in non-procedure primarily based care being reimbursed (and regarded much less vital) than procedure-based care. Give us the demographics of those decision-makers (I’m assuming all cisgendered heterosexual white guys). Share with us how extrapolating this built-in monetary discrimination has resulted in psychiatrists not taking insurance coverage. In different phrases: do actual analysis earlier than throwing stones in glass homes.
— Brian Dixon
***
This text ignores the very apparent elephant within the room. It implies that the cash paid by Medicaid/Medicare to assist psychiatry residents really interprets into some form of truthful compensation for his or her work throughout residency. Residents work 60-80 hours per week throughout residency. In return we’re paid someplace between $40,000 and $60,000 a 12 months initially of our coaching, which grows to someplace between $50,000 to $70,000 by the top. In brief, we’re paid about $19 per hour for a few of the most extremely expert work within the nation. I feel that fulfills our social contract fairly properly.
— Karen Abdool
***
Whereas Richard G. Frank’s latest First Opinion piece calls consideration to the issue of lack of entry to psychological well being providers, it inappropriately lays blame for that drawback on the toes of psychiatrists. On the contrary, psychiatrists are working inside advanced programs and advocating fiercely to make sure the widespread provision of high quality care.
For many who are selecting to not take insurance coverage, the easy fact is that the funds don’t add up. Psychiatrists go away coaching with medical college debt, are paid much less per hour than main care physicians and even doctor assistants, and have to spend time or {dollars} on workers to assist cope with administrative complexities like prior authorization. As Frank factors out, insurers, in an effort to chop their very own prices, have restricted networks, established insufficient price schedules, and created administrative obstacles to psychological well being providers. This leaves psychiatrists in a bind when making an attempt to serve sufferers with out going into the pink: and nonetheless, solely 7.7% of psychiatrists have opted out of Medicare. Lots of our members and colleagues clearly wish to take insurance coverage, together with Medicare and Medicaid, however on this actuality, generally we are able to’t.
We wish this example to vary and we’re working laborious on options. Advocacy for psychological well being parity is crucial. Parity received’t be achieved with out enough reimbursement, and we’re working with the Middle for Medicare and Medicaid providers and private and non-private payors to attain it.
In the meantime, demand for psychiatric providers has grown exponentially, and we can not enhance the variety of psychiatrists quick sufficient to fulfill this want. Whereas extra graduate medical examination slots have been created in recent times and the sphere is extra widespread than ever, our doctor members advocate to make sure we keep a robust pipeline to usher in extra certified psychiatrists.
Psychiatrists are additionally on the forefront of advocating for transformative care supply fashions and modalities that can permit for higher entry, together with telepsychiatry, and team-based care to develop entry for all people. Whether or not by means of built-in care choices like Collaborative Care or engaged on groups in different fashions, we’re innovating to succeed in sufferers like by no means earlier than.
The failure isn’t one in every of particular person decisions, however reasonably a systemic failure to fund and assist entry to psychiatric care. Because it stands as we speak, the sphere is pressured to leverage its scarce sources to serve the wants of a rustic going through a psychological well being disaster.
— Marketa Wills, M.D., CEO and medical director of the American Psychiatric Affiliation
“Medicare ought to wait on approving protection for Wegovy,” by Alissa S. Chen
Though by a considerate physician, this text is heavy on emotions and quick on empirical arguments. You might really feel like it’s not a good suggestion, and that may be your private perception, however that doesn’t warrant its getting used as proof towards a therapy that has been clinically demonstrated to have advantages past weight reduction. Analysis on older sufferers is scarce however the place isn’t that the case aside from medicine supposed to ameliorate dementia? How lengthy can we wait earlier than making an attempt this apparently efficacious therapy?
— Steven Struhl, Converge Analytic
***
Please don’t decrease semaglutide by equating it as merely affecting urge for food to counteract “late evening snacking.” The SELECT trial demonstrated that in individuals with BMI of 27 or greater and with out diabetes who had prior coronary heart assault, stroke or peripheral artery illness, taking semaglutide versus placebo was related to 20% discount in subsequent coronary heart assault, stroke and cardiovascular dying! (Disclosure: I co-chaired the Steering Committee for SELECT and have obtained compensation for consulting from Novo Nordisk and lots of different makers of weight problems drugs and gadgets.)
This landmark research is vital data for each doctor, and particularly these in weight problems medication. The SELECT trial studied 17,706 sufferers and greater than 6,000 have been age 65 or older. It used essentially the most rigorous methodology and was executed with precision. The FDA gave Wegovy a sign for secondary prevention of heart problems after rigorous assessment.
Let’s be critical about providing this remedy to individuals who want it. It’s not a way of life remedy. Medicare made the best determination in offering reimbursement for secondary prevention of heart problems.
— Donna Ryan, Pennington Biomedical Analysis Middle
***
As a affected person, I’m disenchanted we’ve got specialists encouraging Medicare NOT to pay for semaglutide and tirzepatide. I’m 69 years outdated and I am going to my PCP’s workplace weekly to get my injection administered. All the price is $350 for semaglutide for 4 weeks, and $450 for the tirzepatide for 4 weeks. I’ve been doing this for 14 months, had no adversarial uncomfortable side effects in any respect and have misplaced 50+ kilos to date. Whereas that is doable for me, I understand many others should not as lucky. I wish to see Medicare observe the lead of personal insurers and begin protecting half or the entire price.
— Penny Ogden
***
I’m 66 and began on prescription Zepbound in February of 2024. I’ve misplaced weight, blood stress is down, undecided about ldl cholesterol although. Not solely does Medicare not pay for it however additionally they don’t permit us to get the large low cost coupon from the producer. Not likely positive if I’ll have the ability to afford this remedy for much longer, which is kind of unhappy.
— Tracey Black
***
As a 68-year-old feminine who has taken Ozempic for 17 months and had it ripped away with Medicare deciding to not cowl it for these with pre-diabetes, I’ve to say I really feel a lot worse now that the burden has come again, together with incessant starvation. In 4 months my A1C, blood stress, and ldl cholesterol went up. My life is once more centered round what I can and mustn’t eat and it’s a fixed battle that may be received quick time period, however not long run.
Ozempic helped my weight keep fixed. I liked the as soon as every week shot after which may neglect about it. I drank a number of water and acquired loads of train. Garments felt good. Now it’s miserable. Can’t transfer as nicely, nothing matches and simply can’t get my weight to cease climbing irrespective of how a lot I train. Medicare ought to approve this therapy for older individuals. Let every physician resolve by affected person if it ought to be used, not the federal government!
— S R Bratton
“Congress referred to as for an ALS moonshot. The plan for it doesn’t go away Earth,” by Bernie Zipprich
That is an excerpt of my testimony to the Nationwide Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medication on my plan to make ALS a livable illness in 10 years:
With veterans 60% extra prone to develop ALS, it’s crucial that we serve those that’ve served within the armed forces. Nonprofit organizations like Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) are uniquely staffed with nationwide service officers who’re ALS advantages specialists. In partnership with the Veterans Administration, PVA’s Medical Providers staff conducts web site visits throughout the nation, participating with ALS specialists.
It was on such a go to that I met Dr. Richard Reimer, medical director of the ALS Clinic on the Palo Alto VA. Collaborating with the Lawrence Livermore Nationwide Lab, Dr. Reimer is utilizing its world-class supercomputer, investigating medicine to repurpose for ALS.
One other research, facilitated by The Nationwide ALS Registry, assesses “Navy exposures and ALS in a big Veteran inhabitants.” Information from the Division of Protection and VA will seize army components similar to department of service, occupation, deployment, demographic, and de-identified well being information.
In response to a Undertaking MinE research, 15% of individuals with Sporadic ALS have a genetic part whereas regional fine-mapping has recognized an extra 690 new ALS-risk genes. This helps the opinion that ALS has multifactorial causes and that genetic testing ought to be routinely supplied as a normal of care.
In conclusion, I wish to echo the emotions of Retired Marine Corps infantry officer, Chris Mulholland, who has been battling ALS since November 2020. In a Navy Instances article titled, “ALS is Killing Veterans,” Chris wrote, “If of a Veteran who has – or had ALS, we want you on this struggle. Too usually ALS exists within the shadows, and people bothered cross so rapidly they will’t communicate for themselves. Be their voice!”
— Juliet Pierce, Paralyzed Veterans of America
