CHICAGO — The profit noticed with lorlatinib (Lorbrena) in 5-year follow-up knowledge from the CROWN trial corresponds to the longest progression-free survival (PFS) reported for any focused remedy in superior non-small cell lung most cancers (NSCLC), mentioned examine presenter Benjamin Solomon, MBBS, PhD, right here on the 2024 American Society of Scientific Oncology (ASCO) annual assembly.
The third-generation ALK inhibitor from Pfizer was related to a 72% enchancment in PFS in sufferers with superior anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC, with 60% of sufferers remaining disease-free at 60 months, in comparison with the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori), additionally from Pfizer. Notably, lorlatinib was related to a 92% discount in intracranial development as effectively.
These outcomes, coupled with the absence of latest security indicators, present that first-line lorlatinib supplies an unprecedented enchancment in outcomes for sufferers with ALK+ NSCLC, added Solomon, head of Lung Medical Oncology on the Peter MacCallum Most cancers Centre in Melbourne, Australia, to a spherical of applause from assembly attendees.
Some specialists famous, nevertheless, that crizotinib was a poor comparator drug as a result of it isn’t a normal possibility for this affected person inhabitants in the USA.
The analysis was concurrently revealed within the Journal of Scientific Oncology.
Contained in the CROWN Trial
Rearrangements of the ALK oncogene account for roughly 5% of NSCLC circumstances, with sufferers sometimes youthful than these with different types of the illness, who’re gentle or never-smokers, and who’ve adenocarcinoma histology.
In 2018, the US Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized lorlatinib to be used in ALK+ metastatic NSCLC that has progressed on crizotinib and no less than one different ALK inhibitor.
As beforehand reported by Medscape Medical Information, an interim evaluation of the continued section 3 CROWN trial, introduced on the 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology Digital Congress, confirmed that first-line lorlatinib considerably extended PFS and decreased intracranial development at 12 months in comparison with crizotinib.
CROWN included sufferers with stage IIIB/IV ALK+ NSCLC who had obtained no prior systemic remedy for metastatic illness. Sufferers with asymptomatic handled or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases have been additionally allowed within the trial.
In complete, 296 sufferers have been randomized to lorlatinib (100 mg, as soon as each day, n = 149) or crizotinib (250 mg twice each day, n = 147) with no crossover permitted between the remedy teams. The first endpoint was PFS as assessed by blinded impartial central evaluate.
The first endpoint analysis was stopped after 3 years however the sufferers continued to be adopted, Solomon mentioned. Within the present publish hoc 5-year evaluation, the median length of follow-up was 60.2 months within the lorlatinib arm and 55.1 months within the crizotinib arm.
Even at this level, the median PFS had nonetheless not been reached with lorlatinib (95% CI, 64.3 months to “not reached”) in contrast with 9.1 months with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13 – 0.27). This translated to a five-year progression-free survival of 60% with lorlatinib vs 8% with crizotinib.
The PFS profit with lorlatinib was seen throughout prespecified subgroups, together with sufferers stratified by ethnic origin, intercourse, age, and smoking standing, in addition to by the presence of mind metastases.
Delving deeper into the info, Solomon reported that lorlatinib was related to a profit in contrast with crizotinib no matter whether or not sufferers had mind metastases at baseline — HR 0.08 in these with mind metastases, HR 0.24 in these with out.
The time to intracranial development was markedly longer with lorlatinib, with the median not reached vs 16.4 months within the crizotinib group (HR, 0.06). General, at 5 years, 92% of sufferers assigned to lorlatinib have been freed from intracranial development, in contrast with 21% of these handled with crizotinib.
Solomon additionally reported no new security indicators, though the speed of grade 3/4 antagonistic occasions was larger with lorlatinib, largely because of the next incidence of grade 3/4 hypertriglyceridemia (25%), weight enhance (23%), hypercholesterolemia (21%), and hypertension (12%). CNS antagonistic occasions have been seen in 42% of sufferers who obtained lorlatinib, of which 86% have been grade 1/2.
Though 23% of sufferers within the lorlatinib arm underwent dose reductions because of antagonistic occasions, Solomon reported that having a dose discount within the first 16 weeks of remedy didn’t impression the efficacy of the drug.
Lastly, lorlatinib was related to a progression-free survival profit over crizotinib in sufferers with poor prognostic biomarkers, such because the EML4-ALK fusion variant and TP53 mutation, and was not related to rising ALK mutations.
In the course of the press convention, David R. Spigel, MD, chief scientific officer on the Sarah Cannon Analysis Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, who was not concerned within the examine, famous that the PFS seen within the examine was “excellent.”
Jessica J. Lin, MD, Heart for Thoracic Cancers, Massachusetts Normal Hospital, Harvard Medical College, Boston, additionally not concerned in CROWN, mentioned that the newest outcomes cement lorlatinib’s place within the first-line remedy panorama.
Requested how she would now deal with a newly identified metastatic ALK+ NSCLC presenting to the clinic, she mentioned that remedy choices will all the time have to be individualized, however lorlatinib could be her most well-liked preliminary remedy for many sufferers.
Inferior Comparator Drug
Regardless of the spectacular findings, some specialists questioned the trial design.
The trial in contrast the brand new agent to crizotinib, which isn’t usually used on this setting within the US, as higher medicine can be found now, famous Spigel.
In reality, lorlatinib has not but gone head-to-head with one other fashionable, next-generation kinase inhibitor in a randomized managed trial, Spigel cautioned.
A doubtlessly extra applicable comparator drug might have been alectinib (Alecensa) — the usual of care on this inhabitants and authorized in 2017 shortly after the CROWN trial began to accrue sufferers. Though alectinib and lorlatinib haven’t been in contrast face to face, of their respective trials towards crizotinib, lorlatinib seems to have edged out alectinib at 24 months — 70% of sufferers have been progression-free vs about 60% who obtained alectinib in a 2017 trial.
Nonetheless, the present outcomes are “among the many greatest we have ever seen,” Spigel mentioned. “The opposite spectacular discovering of this examine is the prevention of development or improvement of latest CNS lesions, one thing that’s fairly terrible for sufferers, and one thing we strive desperately to forestall or deal with for sufferers, as they dwell longer.”
Nonetheless, there may be extra work to be performed.
“We’ve to proceed to refine our understanding of antagonistic occasions and optimum administration methods,” and there is a want for subsequent remedy methods to “rescue illness relapse and to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to first-line lorlatinib,” Lin added.
The examine was funded by Pfizer.Solomon declares relationships with Amgen; AstraZeneca (Inst); BeiGene; Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); GlaxoSmithKline; GlaxoSmithKline (Inst); Janssen (Inst); Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Pfizer (Inst); Roche/Genentech (Inst); Takeda; Sanofi (Inst); UpToDate.Spigel declares relationships with many corporations, together with AbbVie (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Janssen Oncology (Inst); Merck (Inst); Millennium (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Pfizer (Inst).Lin declares relationships with OncLive, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, amongst different corporations.